Study Finds 1 in 3 Americans Have Been Implanted With RFID Chips: Most Victims Were Unaware They Were Implanted.
WIT - Wyoming Institute of Technology
witscience.org/Founded in 1943 as one of America's first independently-owned nuclear science facilities , The Wyoming Institute of Technology has been at ...
Lead scientist on the study, John Brugle, Ph.D. offered the following:
We were motivated to perform this study by all of the public interest in RFID implantation and fears that it would be common place. It turns out, in fact, that it is already common place. We found that a shockingly high number of Americans are carrying RFID implants in their body. The overwhelming majority of these individuals were completely unaware that they had been implanted. I hope that this study causes us to take pause as a society and truly consider the ramifications and implications of human RFID implantation.
The study looked both at the prevalence of RFID implantation, as well as the common implantation locations. In addition to commonly known implantation sites, such as the back of the hand, they also identified many RFID chips that had been implanted in dental fillings. The function of the chips varied, but the authors of the study indicated that many revealed personal identities, including social security numbers, as well as medical records. The best way to determine if you have been implanted with an RFID chip is to consult a qualified medical professional to administer a full body scan with an RFID reader. Concerned citizens can also attempt a self scan, but civilian grade scanners are not always sensitive enough to detect implanted RFID chips.
***** Excerpt From STUDY Below *****
Results
In total, 997 RFID positive individuals were identified out of 2955 individuals screened. This corresponds to roughly 1 in 3 individuals screened, as shown in Figure 1. Individual frequency by region can be seen in Figure 2.
Additionally, tooth fillings were identified as the predominant location for RFID chips. Fifty seven percent of RFID chips identified were located in tooth fillings. Additional RFID locations and their prevalence can be seen in Figure 3.
Discussion
Our work has shown that approximately 1 in 3 individuals in the United States is carrying an RFID microchip. Our sample size was sufficiently large (n=2955) and was spread throughout three distinct geographic regions. Thus, we are comfortable extrapolating our finding to the broader American population.
Intriguingly, the most frequently identified location for an RFID microchip was in tooth fillings. This is contrary to popularly held belief that RFID chips are inserted in the dorsal of the hand near the thumb. More investigation is required to understand the significance of this finding.
Comments From original article:
classic psyops
You admit there is a problem, spew some common knowledge to get everyone to agree and then you sneak in the most obvious sign that you are paid to be here and post this garbage by saying it is used purely for product tracking. They could place the RFID on a sticker, a stamp, packaging, etc but no they are actually IN the item. And then to drive the bullshit home you slam anyone who believes the study is an ominous sign of the obvious corporatocracy we live in
I really hope your getting paid well to post this or at all if you are simply so misinformed to actually believe anything you typed
You admit there is a problem, spew some common knowledge to get everyone to agree and then you sneak in the most obvious sign that you are paid to be here and post this garbage by saying it is used purely for product tracking. They could place the RFID on a sticker, a stamp, packaging, etc but no they are actually IN the item. And then to drive the bullshit home you slam anyone who believes the study is an ominous sign of the obvious corporatocracy we live in
I really hope your getting paid well to post this or at all if you are simply so misinformed to actually believe anything you typed
-
Wonderful response, Eyes wide Open.
-
Eyes Wide Open, are you okay? Do you need some water? I’m not detecting an argument here. You just refer to OP’s comment as garbage. Sorry. That doesn’t help anyone know what you’re talking about or why it is “garbage.” I know you understand what you are saying, but it’s really hard to discern what the issue is when we are not telepathic.
You never explain anything. This dude enumerated some reasonable points, and you never even attempted to address them. What exactly are you objecting to? Personally, I believe your response was an impulsive reaction to the feeling of cognitive dissonance. I see no other way to interpret your comment. It looks like you are having an emotional reaction to something, and I have no clue what that is. Can you please tell me? I’m very curious.
It is important to have a public discussion regarding RFID chips, especially ones that are used in medicine, as they are inside various medical prosthesis.
The questions that I have are:
What information is held or gathered on the RFID chips?
How can that information be read?
Do laws require that RFID chip get disabled at the end of the manufacturing process?
Is there a way to determine if the RFID chip has been disabled?
I believe this study will prompt a discussion, however unfortunately what this study lacks is any sort of perspective – it is just observations without any context. Although I admire Brugle and Franz, who set out to look at the prevalence of RFID in humans, I feel that their study may not prompt discussion, it most likely will only fuel assumptions.
Unfortuntely, people fall into fear-based thinking, a predator – prey mentality, and all rationality is lost. Unfortunately, many people will assume that the RFID found in a third of people will mean that someone is out to hunt them, get them, and treat them like a product. Any rational discussion will be lost in this fear.