February 09 2014 - 911 Theorys Turn Main Stream - New Studies Indicate ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Are Sane; Government Believer Dupes Have Been Found to be Crazy & Hostile.

New Studies: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Sane; Government Dupes Crazy, Hostile.

Saturday, February 8th, 2014. 

The telltale erupting pyroclastic flow of the towers being blown up and out from within. Collapse is an insane deduction. – Z

[We've known this all along but it's interesting to see it coming to light in this well researched manner. Very well put here. - Zen]

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

PressTV
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

ZenGardner.com

Knock ..... knock..!  I believe this should put the fear of a mass awakening into the consciousness of those corrupted politicians and officials who have staked their careers on keeping the TRUTH of 9/11/2001 all their own dirty little secret..

They should be scared as hell as they surly could actually hang in the streets of good 'ol USA.

 .... Morpheus ..... February 09 2014    www.50kview.blogspot.com